Will China help Africa respond to the epidemic?Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Dingxiang Gongquan reported

夜生活

Will China help Africa respond to the epidemic?Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Dingxiang Gongquan reported
People’s Daily Online, Beijing, February 25. According to the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on February 25, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs called it Zhao Lijian to host a regular press conference.The full text is as follows: At the invitation of State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Serbian First Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Dacic carried out an official visit to China from February 26 to 27.I would like to inform you of a number: According to statistics released by the National Health Committee of China this morning, 2589 cases of cured and discharged patients were added in China from 0-24 on February 24.As of 24:00 on February 24, 27,323 cases of discharged patients were gradually cured in China.Q: You have just announced that the first Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Serbia will visit China.Can you introduce this interviewer arrangement and how to evaluate the current China-Serbia relations?Answer: This is a good question.During the visit, State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi will hold talks with the first deputy prime minister and foreign minister of Dacic.This is the first deputy prime minister and foreign minister of Dacic to visit China again after more than 3 years.At present, the Chinese government and people are working hard to combat the new crown pneumonia epidemic. The visit of the First Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Dacic to China at this special moment reflects the deep friendship and strong support of the Serbian government and people for China.I believe this visitor has important significance for gradually reaching consensus, deepening China-Serbia political mutual trust, and promoting practical cooperation in various fields.China has a profound traditional friendship with Serbia.Serbia is the first Central and Eastern European country to establish a comprehensive strategic partnership with China.Absolutely, the two sides have continued high-level exchanges, strengthened mutual political trust, fruitful practical cooperation, and maintained close cultural and local exchanges.China is willing to promote the sustainable and healthy development of China-Serbia relations within the framework of the joint construction of the “Belt and Road” and China-CEE cooperation.Question: Yesterday, Gui Minhai was sentenced to imprisonment for illegally providing information overseas.Can you further disclose what information he illegally obtained and provided?The Swedish government did not receive any information that he did not want to continue to retain Swedish citizenship and restore Chinese citizenship.What’s your opinion?Answer: On February 24, the Ningbo Intermediate People’s Court sentenced Gui Minhai to 10 years in prison and deprived of political rights for 5 years for the crime of illegally providing intelligence abroad.Providing illegal information overseas is an act that seriously damages China’s national security and interests.China is a country under the rule of law. Chinese judicial organs handle cases strictly in accordance with the law, make the above judgments, and fully protect the legal rights of Gui Minhai.China resolutely opposes any country, any organization, and anyone interferes with China’s internal affairs and judicial sovereignty in any form.Gui Minhai was originally from Ningbo, China. She joined Swedish citizenship in 1996. In 2018, Gui Minhai voluntarily applied to the Chinese public security organ to restore Chinese nationality, and the public security organ approved it according to law.According to the Nationality Law of the People’s Republic of China, China does not recognize Chinese citizens with dual nationality, and is not allowed to retain foreign nationality if it is approved to restore Chinese nationality.After Gui Minhai restored Chinese nationality, China only recognized him as a Chinese citizen according to law.I think I answered your question.Q: The Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization will be elected next week in normal antiques. China has nominated Ms. Wang Binying, the current Deputy Director General of the organization, to run.There is too much news that the United States is sparing no effort to obstruct Chinese candidates.The US Secretary of State Pompeo’s team said that China has been accused of stealing intellectual property for a long time, and it is ridiculous for China to lead an agency that helps formulate cross-border intellectual property policies.Navarro, director of the White House National Trade Commission, wrote in the Financial Times that the alternative is to let China control the World Intellectual Property Organization.What’s your opinion?Answer: China is a global innovation power and intellectual property power.China’s nomination of a candidate for election as Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization reflects China’s positive intention to contribute to international intellectual property cooperation and development.Chinese candidate Ms. Wang Binying is an outstanding international intellectual property expert who has worked for ownership organizations for nearly 30 years. She has a high reputation in the international intellectual property community and within the ownership organization.Competitive candidate.This nomination is also in line with the international community’s expectations of more prominent women as heads of international organizations to advance gender equality.However, the world has seen that in order to suppress China, the United States has spared no effort to pressure some countries to force them to give up their support for Chinese candidates.Threatening blackmail.As China fights the new coronary pneumonia epidemic nationwide, the United States has teamed up with some countries to put pressure on other countries to obstruct and disrupt the competition of Chinese candidates.Any election must be fair and work in accordance with the rules.The United States, however, ignores the rules and does not abide by the rules. For narrow political purposes, it arrogantly smears and suppresses China.We cannot help asking who gave the United States the right to turn a professional election into a political farce?Each country is a sovereign country and has the right to independently determine its voting position in accordance with its own considerations and interests.The United States has no candidates of its own, and has only the right to decide on its own vote.We can’t help asking, who gave the United States the right to point at others and impose it on others?Competence is paramount, and women’s priority is an important criterion for the election of international institutions. It has been regarded by Western countries including the United States as a guide.We can’t help but ask, why did the United States immediately tear off its camouflage and left these principles and standards behind when it arrived in China?We are full of confidence in Ms. Wang Binying’s ability and respect for candidates from other five countries, and are willing to start a fair and friendly competition with them.China believes that all countries where the host is righteous and adheres to principles will resolutely resist this immoral behavior of the United States and allow this election to be conducted in a fair and just alternative.Q: On the 22nd, WHO Director-General Tan Desai delivered a video speech at the AU Emergency Health Ministers’ Meeting, stating that WHO is still in the spread of the new coronary pneumonia epidemic in countries with weak health systems, leading the international community to support those who are most vulnerable.Fragile states.Will China provide assistance to Africa?Answer: We have taken note of the statement made by Director-General Tan Desai.Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia, the Chinese government and people have spared no effort to fight the epidemic.We have adopted the most comprehensive, strictest and most thorough prevention and control interventions.Facts have proven that significant achievements have been made in prevention and control.As World Health Organization Director-General Tan Desai pointed out, China’s enhanced reorganization not only controlled the spread of the epidemic in Chinese territory, but also prevented the epidemic from spreading to other countries, thus gaining time for global epidemic prevention and control.In the course of fighting the epidemic, African countries provided precious support and assistance to China as soon as possible despite their own limited conditions.Not long ago, the 36th AU Ministerial Conference and the AU Peace and Sanctions Conference both published papers in support of China’s efforts to fight the epidemic.The emergency meeting of African Ministers of Health just concluded also highly evaluated China’s resistance to the disease.At the critical moment, Africa stands with China, which is the best interpretation of the idea of a community of shared future for mankind.”The grace of dripping water should be reported to the spring” is the fine tradition of the Chinese nation.We will keep in mind the friendship and help of this guide, continue to improve the results of the “Belt and Road” and the Beijing Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, and provide support within our capacity to countries with weak health systems to help them strengthen their epidemic prevention and control capabilities and maintain regionsAnd global public health security.Q: According to reports, some officials of the US Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health recently said that China has used the expertise of US universities to enhance its military and technological competitiveness, and has recruited top US researchers, entrepreneurs and experts to China through recruitment.Way “stealing” the US scientific research results.What’s China’s comment?A: I have taken note of relevant reports and would like to make some comments: First, China ‘s scientific and technological achievements do not rely on stealing or robbing. The Chinese people, including the majority of intellectuals, struggled with wisdom and sweat.Statistics show that from 2009 to 2019, Chinese scientific and technological personnel published a total of 2.6 million international papers, ranking second in the world.Second, it is in the common interest of both sides to strengthen scientific and technological exchanges and cooperation.Under the banner of national security, some U.S. officials are playing up the so-called “stolen” U.S. scientific research achievements by the Chinese side with no intention.Some U.S. college leaders also believe that U.S. officials’ restrictions on national security are too exaggerated and discriminatory, and said that cooperation with China has actually played a role in promoting the development of science and technology.Third, the transnational flow of talents has promoted the advancement of science and technology in the world.All countries are actively carrying out international talent exchange and cooperation.The United States is more reasonable in this regard.What China has adopted to gradually promote the flow of talents between China and other countries, and encourage and promote international scientific and technological cooperation, these alternatives are actually essentially different from the common practices of other countries in the world.We urge individual US officials to re-approve the outdated concepts of the Cold War mentality and zero-sum game, properly treat and maintain China-US exchanges and cooperation in the fields of science, technology, and humanities, and do more to promote mutual trust and cooperation between China and the US.Q: The first question is that the epidemic of new crown pneumonia in Italy, South Korea, Iran and other countries is expanding. What suggestions does China have for these countries?The second question, Wuhan issued a notice yesterday saying that some personnel can leave the city if certain conditions are met, but the notice was later withdrawn.What I want to ask is, when can foreign citizens in Wuhan leave Wuhan?Answer: Thank you for your question.Regarding your first question, China is paying attention to the development of new crown pneumonia outbreaks in Korea, Italy, Iran and other countries.Since the outbreak, the governments and people of these countries have provided valuable support and assistance to the Chinese people in fighting the epidemic, and China is deeply grateful for this.These countries are China’s friendly partners, and we should strengthen cooperation in fighting the epidemic.China is willing to share information and experience with the above-mentioned countries while striving to fight the epidemic situation in its own country, and provide support and assistance within its capacity according to their needs.Regarding your second question, I suggest you learn more from the relevant local government.Question: At present, the number of confirmed cases of new coronary pneumonia in Japan and South Korea is increasing, and the epidemic prevention and control measures are becoming increasingly severe.Does China allow Japan and South Korea to take restrictions such as prohibiting entry of people?A: China is paying close attention to Japan and South Korea’s new crown pneumonia epidemic development and feels the same.Since the outbreak of the epidemic, Japan and South Korea have replaced the government and people to provide valuable support and help to the Chinese people in fighting the epidemic. China is deeply grateful for this.China, Japan and South Korea are close neighbors to each other. Neighbors should watch and help each other and strengthen cooperation.We are willing to share information and experience with Japan and South Korea while working hard to fight the epidemic in our country, and provide support and assistance within our capacity according to their needs.In the face of the epidemic, I think it is the responsibility of all countries to protect the lives and health of their people and maintain regional and global public health security.We are willing to communicate and collaborate closely with relevant countries such as Japan, South Korea, and other countries to strengthen joint prevention, prevention, and control, and take appropriate and necessary measures to effectively prevent the spread of the epidemic and jointly safeguard regional and global public health security.Q: According to reports, US officials have stated that they are considering “punishing” Chinese journalists in the United States as a countermeasure against China’s “expulsion” of Wall Street Journal reporters.Has the US communicated with China?Does China ask the US not to take the above measures?A: Yesterday I answered too many questions about the Wall Street Journal.In response to your question today, I would like to replace the following: First, the term “East Asian Sick Man” is connected with a specific history of China and is extremely insulting. The newspaper has openly replaced the headline with racial discrimination and challenged the Chinese side.The bottom line of dignity has hurt the feelings of the Chinese people, and the Chinese people are extremely indignant about this.Some U.S. officials should carefully read the joint e-mail of the Wall Street Journal’s 53 employees in China. They said in the e-mail, “This is not a matter of editorial independence or the division of news reports and comments.”This is a wrong title, and it deeply offends many people, including the Chinese.”Anyone with conscience and ethics should oppose and resist such improper wrong words and deeds, instead of distinguishing between black and white, and even consider supporting the media of a company that does not admit its mistakes and refuses to apologize.Secondly, some US officials must be free to comment and press. I would like to ask, what punishment would a 无锡桑拿网 media face if it made flagrant racial discrimination in the United States?The US government adopts an attitude of “serving the one who lives with me, and dying against the one who is dead”. The international community has witnessed this. Is this what the United States calls freedom of speech?Did the relevant US officials forget how the White House treats CNN and other media?US officials should explain how many Chinese media have refused visas or delayed visas to the US for various reasons in the past two years?Third, China has always welcomed the comprehensive and objective coverage of China by foreign media, and has always provided support and convenience for journalists from all countries to cover and report in China in accordance with international practices and laws.At the same time, we resolutely oppose acts that maliciously smear China and violate China’s dignity under the 杭州桑拿网 banner of freedom of expression.Foreign resident news agencies and foreign journalists must abide by Chinese laws, regulations and rules, and observe journalistic ethics, which is the same in any country.We urge the US to take off its ideological colored glasses, stop making irresponsible remarks, stop blameless China, and do more things that are conducive to China-US mutual trust and cooperation.Question: Yesterday I saw the news that China’s “two sessions” replaced antiques. The specific date for antiques has not yet been decided.The Air Force and the reorganized government of China and Japan are preparing the arrangement of President Xi Jinping’s April visit to Japan.Will the “two sessions” really affect President Xi Jinping’s plan to visit Japan?A: Thank you for your interest in President Xi’s visit to Japan.In fact, both China and Japan are actively responding to the epidemic, and we also agree that we should continue to work together to make preparations in all aspects for advancing the next major diplomatic agenda.If we have news, it will be released in time, so please stay tuned.Q: The Wall Street Journal reporter Deng Chao whose journalist ID has been revoked by China is in Wuhan. How is she now?Will the Chinese government help her leave China?Answer: You are asking about Deng Chao.She has her journalist ID revoked and is still in Wuhan.For consideration, we will continue to allow her to stay in Wuhan, but she cannot engage in interviews.The reporter should leave the country as soon as the closure of Wuhan’s control measures is lifted.